“Customer adoption increased 18%.”
No source or underlying data was supplied.
Learn a practical method for checking AI-generated reports, requirements, analysis and decisions before they reach customers or leadership.
For engineering, product and delivery leaders using AI in consequential work.
7:30–9:30 PM IST · 2:00–4:00 PM UTC · English
Q3 delivery improved significantly across the programme.
42 stories completed against 38 committed.Source not provided
Team throughput remained stable across the quarter.
Cycle time improved 18% quarter on quarter.Not present in source material
The course turns vague “human review” into three concrete decisions: what you can ship, what you must check and what a human must own.
“Customer adoption increased 18%.”
No source or underlying data was supplied.
“We will launch in September.”
The source only said “targeting September.” Intent became commitment.
“The feature is delivered.”
Implementation is complete, but acceptance testing is still open.
Use Ask, Done, Guardrail and Edge to expose risk before someone depends on the answer.
What exactly is AI being asked to do?
What does a good answer look like?
What must the output not do?
If it is wrong, what breaks?
A status update, requirement, analysis or executive summary.
Test evidence, scope, assumptions, context and consequences.
Choose the verification level and explain why it is appropriate.
Two live labs · 10 & 17 October · $200

Vinod Narayanswamy · Founder, Medhova
Vinod teaches leaders to bring evidence, boundaries and accountability back into AI-assisted work. Medhova is focused on practice—not tool demonstrations, prompt tricks or attendance-only credentials.
Join a free 60-minute live teardown on 26 September. No tool tour. No sales webinar.