See what “looks right” hides
- Apply the Four Questions
- Inspect three plausible AI outputs
- Classify Ship, Check or Own
- Choose a real workplace artefact
Learn how to spot unsupported claims, scope drift and false completion before AI-assisted work reaches customers or leadership.
· English
The team completed all committed scope and eliminated the principal dependency risk.
Cycle time improved by 18%.Source not provided
You will not leave with a list of prompts. You will leave able to decide what deserves verification and explain why.
Define Ask, Done, Guardrail and Edge before trusting the result.
Test evidence, scope, assumptions, context and consequences.
Decide whether to Ship, Check or Own the work.
Show the material issue and the check that exposed it.

Vinod Narayanswamy · Founder, Medhova
Vinod’s work focuses on delivery judgment, evidence and accountability. This workshop uses realistic work artefacts and small-group review—not tool demonstrations or generic case studies.
10 & 17 October 2026 · 7:30–9:30 PM IST · 2:00–4:00 PM UTC · $200 · 15 seats.
Teaching language: English. See the refund and transfer policy.
No. You should already use or review AI-assisted work, but no coding or model-building experience is required.
Yes, recordings are included for registered participants. Live participation is recommended because the course depends on discussion and applied review.
A documented material issue in AI-assisted work, plus the check that exposed it. It demonstrates applied judgment; it is not an industry accreditation.
Medhova confirms availability, payment instructions and preparation details by email. Your place is confirmed after payment.